Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Risk Factors and Patterns of Treponema Infection Affecting Olive Baboons in Gombe National Park

Created on 11 Nov 2025

Authors

Mwacha, D., Collins, D. A., Raphael, J., Wambura, P., Hoza, A.

Abstract

Treponema pallidum subsp. pertenue (TPE) causes yaws, a chronic, nonvenereal Treponematosis characterized by contagious cutaneous lesions in early stages and destructive bone involvement in the tertiary stage. In the latency stage, the infection is asymptomatic with only serologic markers. A retrospective analysis of health, demographic, and behavioral records using a Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) with binomial distribution, conducted through R software to assess disease risks and trends from January 2019 to December 2024 of wild baboons at Gombe, revealed an overall clinical prevalence of 11.24% (2018/17946) across the eight studied troops. Age was a strong predictor where infants (OR = 0.05, p < 0.001), juveniles (OR = 0.27, p < 0.001), and subadults (OR = 0.65, p < 0.01) had significantly reduced odds of displaying Treponema signs compared to adults. Troops B.C and D.D exhibited elevated infection risk (OR = 2.74 and 2.63, respectively). Pregnant females (OR = 0.19, p < 0.001), wounded baboons (OR = 0.45, p < 0.001), and male immigrants (OR = 0.47, p < 0.001) were less likely to show signs. Infection signs were also lower during wet seasons (OR = 0.81, p < 0.001). Notably, the odds of infection increased consistently over time (Year OR = 1.73, p < 0.001). Understanding the ecological and demographic determinants of Treponema transmission is essential for disease surveillance, conservation, and One Health initiatives. This study presents the first long-term dataset on (TPE) infection in wild baboons from Tanzania and East Africa.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 11 Nov 2025.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 23
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement