Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Lgr5+ Stem Cells Maintain Apex Position in Cell Hierarchy of the Intestinal Epithelium During Homeostasis and Injury

Created on 12 Nov 2025

Authors

Chua, J., Driver, L., Narimatsu, M., Fink, M., Luo, L., Tran, J., Kaur, A., Habib, R., Roper, J., G. Kirsch, D., L. Wrana, J., Lee, C.-L., Ayyaz, A.

Abstract

The cellular origin of intestinal epithelial homeostasis and regeneration has been a subject of continued debate, with recent models challenging the primacy of WNT-dependent Lgr5 crypt base columnar (CBC) cells as the central intestinal stem cell population. Here, we revisit this question through quantitative integration of single-cell transcriptomic, chromatin accessibility, spatial, and lineage-tracing analyses across the proximal-to-distal axis of the small intestinal epithelium. Our data show that under homeostatic conditions, Lgr5 cells exclusively sustain epithelial self-renewal in nearly all crypt-villus units along the entire length of the small intestine, a process for which R-spondin is indispensable. Following irradiation or chemotoxic injury, surviving Lgr5 cells and their progeny reprogram into transient fetal-like cell states that initiate epithelial repair. Crucially, successful regeneration depends on the reactivation of canonical WNT/{beta}-catenin signaling, as evidenced by increased TCF motif accessibility and upregulation of WNT target genes in newly forming Lgr5+ stem cells. Accordingly, pharmacological inhibition of WNT signaling blocks the reconstitution of Lgr5 cells and crypt regeneration, leading to epithelial collapse. These findings reconcile prior controversies by demonstrating the central role of Lgr5 CBC cells in epithelial self-renewal and regeneration following injury.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 12 Nov 2025.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 53
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement