Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Nano-Mod-Amp reveals RNA sequence, structural and cell type specific features of pseudouridylation by PUS7

Created on 01 Nov 2025

Authors

Rodell, R., Jain, R., Shenasa, H., Montes, M., Robalin, N., Prodic, S., Eyras, E., Martinez, N.

Abstract

Pseudouridines are abundant mRNA modifications that can impact splicing, translation, and stability to tune gene expression. PUS7 is one of the major mRNA pseudouridine synthase whose dysregulation leads to neurodevelopmental disorders and cancer, underscoring the critical function of PUS7-dependent pseudouridines. Beyond a short and degenerate consensus sequence, the molecular mechanisms underlying PUS7-mediated pseudouridylation remain unknown. A lack of targeted, high-throughput pseudouridine detection methods limits simultaneous interrogation of PUS7 regulatory features across many experimental conditions. We developed novel Nanopore sequencing tools, including Nano-Mod-Amp, to reveal pseudouridine stoichiometry, its RNA structural context, and dependence on PUS7 levels at specific sites across biological conditions. We identified a novel RNA structural signature that is associated with more efficient mRNA modification by PUS7. Pseudouridines are largely responsive to modulations in PUS7 protein levels, demonstrating the regulatory potential of varying PUS7 levels across cellular conditions. Conversely, PUS7 activity is also regulated in a cell-type specific manner, independent of PUS7 expression levels in a manner consistent with regulation by RNA structure and RNA binding proteins. Together, we developed Nanopore sequencing tools and uncovered new mechanisms of PUS7 regulation with a framework that can be applied to other RNA-modifying enzymes to query the regulation of the epitranscriptome.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 01 Nov 2025.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 33
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement