Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Glacier retreat reshapes trophic networks: interaction turnover outpaces species turnover over space-time

Created on 16 Apr 2026

Authors

Tu, B. N., Mas-Carrio, E., Hodecek, J., Khelidj, N., Casartelli, M., Rasmann, S., Fumagalli, L., Losapio, G.

Abstract

As glaciers retreat worldwide, newly exposed terrains are rapidly colonized by plants and their associated animal communities. Although plant-animal interactions are key for biodiversity maintenance and ecosystem functioning, the ecological processes underlying the assembly and development of trophic interactions over space-time remain poorly understood. Here, we investigated the trophic niche structure of plant-arthropod interactions along a 140-year primary succession at Mont Mine glacier foreland (Switzerland). Using arthropod gut-content DNA metabarcoding, we reconstructed trophic interactions at the food web level, revealing numerous previously undetected links among 284 arthropod taxa feeding on 263 plant taxa. Trophic niche overlap among arthropods increased following glacier retreat, indicating decreasing resource partitioning and suggesting increased resource competition. Trophic niche breadth became narrower and diet species richness declined, indicating increased trophic specialization. Notably, changes in trophic interactions occurred more rapidly than shifts in species diversity or community composition of plants and arthropods. These results demonstrate that glacier retreat reorganizes trophic networks beyond simple species turnover, reshaping biotic interactions during ecosystem development. Our findings highlight trophic interactions as sensitive indicators of biodiversity change and suggest that the stability of emerging food webs may be strongly affected as glaciers vanish worldwide.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 16 Apr 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 20
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement