When feedback backfires: investigating neurofeedback effects in a closed-loop auditory attention decoding paradigm

Authors

Rotaru, I., Geirnaert, S., Heintz, N., Bertrand, A., Francart, T.

Abstract

Selective auditory attention decoding (AAD) enables tracking which of multiple concurrent speakers a listener attends to and is a key building block for neuro-steered hearing devices. While AAD integrated in a closed-loop system with real-time neurofeedback (NFB) is hypothesized to improve decoding through neural adaptation and error-correction behaviour, the short-term behavioral and algorithmic impact of such a bilateral human-machine interaction remains poorly understood. Here we evaluated the effects of NFB on AAD accuracy and user experience in a single-session AAD paradigm with online NFB involving nineteen participants. They performed a selective listening task with enforced attention switches across four conditions: open-loop (OL), closed-loop with auditory gain feedback (CLA), closed-loop with visual feedback (CLV), and a condition with pseudo-auditory gain control (psCLA) decoupled from the participants' individual neural activity. AAD was performed online using both subject-specific and subject-independent linear decoders on 5 s sliding windows, followed by Hidden Markov Model post-processing. Online analysis showed comparable decoding performance across all conditions. However, offline posthoc analysis using subject-independent decoders revealed that AAD accuracy in the CLA condition was significantly lower than in the OL baseline. Subjectively, participants reported that CLA was significantly more distracting and required higher switching effort. Crucially, a causal analysis of the psCLA condition found no robust evidence that higher audio gains inherently improve decoding accuracy. Our results demonstrate that within a single-session paradigm with rapidly varying feedback cues, auditory neurofeedback may degrade AAD performance by increasing cognitive load and distraction. These findings suggest that suboptimal feedback can impede rather than facilitate learning. We conclude that more accurate and stable decoders and longitudinal, multi-session training protocols are likely essential prerequisites for achieving beneficial neurofeedback effects in closed-loop auditory attention systems.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 01 May 2026.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.