Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Time, Not fungicide treatment, influences the resistome of the turf phyllosphere

Created on 04 Jun 2026

Authors

Wieber, N., Haney, S., Lazarcik, J., Koch, P. L., Barak, J. D.

Abstract

Antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) are an emerging class of environmental contaminants with significant implications for public health. Previous studies have linked fungicide exposure to elevated levels of ARGs in soil microbiomes, but research investigating the impacts of fungicide on ARGs within phyllosphere bacterial communities is limited. To address this, creeping bentgrass was treated with the fungicide active ingredients chlorothalonil, fluxapyroxad, and propiconazole and sampled at 4 hours, 96 hours, and one week post-application. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) was performed to quantify the abundance of ARGs and a metal resistance genes (MRG) abundance relative to 16s. Additionally, 16S rRNA gene sequencing was performed to characterize bacterial community composition. Results indicated that fungicide treatments did not significantly alter the relative abundance of ARGs or an MRG within bent grass bacterial communities. However, significant changes were observed over time, with changes in ARG and MRG abundance mirroring temporal shifts in bacterial beta diversity. ARGs and the MRG relative abundance had significant correlations with Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Bacteriadota, and Firmicutes, including with genera Pseudoxanthomas, and Dyandobacter, which contain opportunistic human pathogens. This study demonstrates that fungicides have limited influence on the abundance of ARGs and MRGs in the phyllosphere and helps guide further investigations aiming to mitigate the spread of antibiotic resistance.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 04 Jun 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 31
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement