Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Topology-aware thermodynamics for DNA probe design under fixed stringency: Retained paired boxes link mismatch placement, nearest-neighbor stability and room-temperature diagnostic specificity

Created on 13 Jun 2026

Authors

Brukner, I., Krajinovic, M.

Abstract

DNA probe specificity is usually screened by mismatch number, melting temperature and full-duplex nearest-neighbor free energy. These scalar quantities are necessary but obscure the spatial organization of pairing: an off-target can retain one long paired box or split the same matches into short fragments. We define thermodynamics without topology as scalar full-duplex nearest-neighbor DeltaG and thermodynamics with topology as redistribution of nearest-neighbor contributions over retained paired boxes. The practical score family begins with edge-corrected effective complementary islands, extends to the count Nbox(L,k) of contiguous boxes of length at least k, and culminates in Zbox,NN(k,T), a retained-box partition weighted by nearest-neighbor stability. Reanalysis of published mismatch-probe datasets shows why the distinction matters: distributed or staggered mismatches are far more disruptive than clustered mismatches at comparable burden; 50-mer mismatch probes show distribution- and temperature-dependent residual signal; maximum perfect-match length explains a substantial fraction of 60-mer mismatch signal ratios; and zipper/partition-function modeling explains position-dependent mismatch discrimination. An Affymetrix fixed-mismatch subset and an ambient-temperature HPV probe panel provide independent control and diagnostic context. The framework offers an auditable rule for fixed-stringency probe design: preserve intended retained continuity, fragment the strongest off-target retained box, then validate in the final buffer and readout.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 13 Jun 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 6
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement