Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Serotype-Specific Detection of Non-Structural Protein 1 from Dengue Viruses by Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy: An Enhanced Precision Diagnosis

Created on 15 Jun 2026

Authors

Ghalawat, M., Meena, V. K., Basu, A., Poddar, P.

Abstract

Dengue disease exhibits diverse clinical manifestations in patients when infected by its different serotypes. Early and accurate detection of dengue virus (DENV) infections, particularly distinguishing between serotypes is crucial for effective patient management and sporadic outbreak control. Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (SERS) offers advantages of high sensitivity, rapid acquisition, rapid analysis, minimal sample and preparation requirements. In this study, we present a simple and reproducible approach for serotype-specific detection of non-structural protein 1 (NS1) utilizing SERS on an aluminium based substrate. Leveraging specific vibrational signatures of NS1 protein from DENV serotypes, we demonstrated the potential of SERS to discriminate between NS1 proteins across DENV serotypes and also the amino acid residue variations that exist among them from different biological samples. Study demonstrates the SERS based detection of NS1 in the current in-vitro setting has sensitivity and specificity comparable to ELISA assays with limit of detection (LOD) reaching to 1ng/mL. However, the application of nanomaterials-based SERS substrate has potential to further enhance the LOD enabling detection even at lower concentrations. This approach holds promise for advancing our capacity to rapidly diagnose serotypic DENV infection in samples, studying pathogenesis and improving strategies for disease management and control. Keywords: Dengue Virus, NS1 Protein, Raman Spectroscopy, Mutation, SERS

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 15 Jun 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 9
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement