Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Morphological shifts consistent with the island syndrome in land-bridge island birds

Created on 15 Jun 2026

Authors

Hoepel, M. J. K., Steibl, S., Melo, M., Motove Etingüe, A., Clegg, S. M., Miller, S. C., Serra-Marin, P. E., Owono Nchama, P., Asangono Edjang Maye, U. R., Hayden Bofill, S., Fero Mene, M., Gonder, K., Valente, L.

Abstract

Land-bridge islands are former mainland areas isolated by post-glacial sea-level rise (<15,000 years) and the most common island type. Because of their recurrent connectivity with continents, it is unclear whether species on land-bridge islands can undergo evolutionary changes associated with the more isolated oceanic islands ('island syndrome'). Here, we test the hypothesis that the selective environment on land-bridge islands exerts predictable and consistent evolutionary shifts in morphological traits of songbirds. We apply Bayesian hierarchical models to a morphological dataset of 6,917 individuals comprising 185 species of songbirds from four land-bridge islands (Bioko, Sri Lanka, Taiwan and Trinidad) and adjacent continents. Across all 185 species, we find that occurrence on a land-bridge island has clear directional effects on five morphological traits related to beak, wing, and tarsus, as well as a general increase in body size. At the species level, 57 out of 90 tested species exhibit significant morphological divergence between land-bridge island and mainland, yet for only 20 of these are the land-bridge island populations recognised as distinct endemic subspecies. Our results show that occurrence on land-bridge islands has a detectable effect on passerine morphology consistent with the island syndrome, and suggest these islands harbour previously unrecognized unique biodiversity.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 15 Jun 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 8
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement