Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Internal decay in living trees: a quantitative tomography framework and its application in a temperate forest

Created on 15 Jun 2026

Authors

Thompson, G., Lutz, M. P., Lucey, T. K., Duncan, B., Yang, M., Jurado, S., Matthes, J. H., Marra, R. E., Gewirtzman, J.

Abstract

Internal decay in living trees is an important component of carbon and nutrient cycling as well as species and structural diversity maintenance in forest ecosystems. We used sonic and electrical resistance tomography to evaluate and compare the prevalence and severity of stem decay in 57 living trees among four common species (Acer rubrum L., Nyssa sylvatica Marsh., Quercus rubra L., and Tsuga canadensis (L.) Carriere)) with overlapping and non-overlapping distributions across wetland and upland habitat types at the Harvard Forest in Petersham, MA, USA. Independent of tree size, site identity best explained variation in the prevalence of decay across trees sampled, whereas species identity best explained the severity of decay. We categorized trees as having no decay, incipient decay, active decay, or cavities based on combined sonic and electrical resistance metrics, the latter generated by a custom image analysis application. About 31% of wetland trees exhibited incipient decay (compared to 11% in the upland), whereas about 32% of upland trees exhibited active decay (compared to 10% in the wetland). Our study highlights a new quantitative framework for decay categorization through normalized principal component analysis (PCA) and decay analysis software that complements dual tomographic methodology for future investigations of ecological drivers of decay presence and susceptibility.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 15 Jun 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 9
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement