Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Climbing-fiber-like online readout adaptation in frozen continuous-time networks reproduces force-field adaptation and after-effects

Created on 16 Jun 2026

Authors

Kobayashi, J.

Abstract

Robotic motor control built on liquid neural networks and related continuous-time models, such as LTC and CfC, is typically trained offline via backpropagation through time and lacks an explicit mechanism for recalibrating online as plant dynamics change. We ask whether a frozen CfC core, whose liquid state spans a fixed continuous-time basis, can support cerebellar-style online adaptation by adapting only its linear readout with a climbing-fiber-like error signal. In a planar two-link reaching simulation with a velocity-dependent curl force field, we adapt the readout online with a feedback-error-learning (FEL) signal under a least-mean-squares (LMS) rule, leaving the core untouched. The frozen-core readout-only controller re-straightens curl-perturbed reaches and, upon field removal, produces a mirror-image after-effect---the signature of internal-model learning---that a feedback-only controller does not produce. The result generalizes from a dense CfC to a sparse Neural-Circuit-Policy (NCP) wiring when the recurrent state, rather than the projected motor output, is used as the readout basis; it is robust to force-field strength and direction; and a recursive-least-squares variant adapts faster but de-adapts slowly because its covariance collapses, a rigidity that a covariance-reset safe-forgetting rule removes. Within the explored two-link planar simulation range, we did not find a capacity limit that would require adapting the frozen core in the tested conditions. In this simulation study, adapting only the readout therefore provides a biologically inspired, low-cost online error-adaptation layer for offline-trained continuous-time controllers.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 16 Jun 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 12
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement