Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

MALDI-ToF detection of Leishmania infantum infection in Lutzomyia longipalpis and Nyssomyia neivai

Created on 20 Jun 2026

Authors

de Souza, L. A. F., Kariya, E., Prudhomme, J., Depaquit, J., Vieira da Costa-Ribeiro, M. C., Huguenin, A.

Abstract

Background Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-ToF MS) is widely used for sand fly identification, but its potential to detect Leishmania infections in vectors remain underexplored. This pilot study evaluated whether MALDI-ToF MS protein profiles of lab-reared Lutzomyia longipalpis and Nyssomyia neivai can discriminate Leishmania infantum-infected from uninfected females. Methodology Colonies were experimentally infected with L. infantum using membrane feeding, and females were collected at different days post-blood meal. Thoraces and legs were processed individually for MALDI-ToF MS, and spectra were analysed using both Bruker software and custom R pipelines. Principal findings Unsupervised approaches (MSP dendrograms, PCA) showed limited or inconsistent separation of infection status for Lu. longipalpis. In contrast, supervised machine-learning models built on peak-intensity matrices achieved excellent discrimination between infected and uninfected specimens for both species, with several algorithms reaching near-perfect performance on an external test set not used for training. Variable-importance analysis highlighted sets of m/z peaks, mainly showing decreased intensity in infected sand flies, as putative infection biomarkers. Conclusion This proof-of-concept study highlights that L. infantum infection induces reproducible, species-specific alterations in sand-fly MALDI-TOF profiles, supporting further development of high-throughput, MS-based screening of infected vectors.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 20 Jun 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 1
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement