Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

A gavage-fomite based method to generate mouse models with natural microbiota

Created on 20 Jun 2026

Authors

Han, G., Hasan, M. H., Adesioye, O., Pacia, J., Ramprashad, J. C., Valdez, G., Vaishnava, S., Beura, L. K.

Abstract

Laboratory-raised specific pathogen-free (SPF) mice have been indispensable for fundamental immunology research, yet their reliability in predicting human clinical outcomes has been questionable. A major factor contributing to this disconnect is the sanitized housing environment, which deprives laboratory mice of physiological microbial exposure critical for immune maturation. Various approaches have been developed to introduce microbes to SPF mice, aiming to mimic human-like microbial experiences and engender adult human-like immune traits. However, some of these methods, specifically the pet store mice cohousing approach suffer from significant variability in pathogen exposure driven by the uncontrolled nature of microbial exchange and is associated with heightened mortality. Here we present an alternative gavage-fomite (GaF) method that exposes mice to a similarly diverse array of pathogens and commensal as the pet store cohousing method while limiting mortality. GaF-treated mice exhibited consistent gut microbial composition, robust immune maturation characterized by mucosal T-cell distribution, elevated serum inflammatory cytokines, and a splenic immune transcriptional signature closely aligned with that of adult humans. Furthermore, these mice demonstrated enhanced protection against a virulent bacterial challenge. The simplicity, and effectiveness of the GaF method for generating 'mice with natural microbiota,' may support broader use of these models in basic and translational immunological research across institutions.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 20 Jun 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 1
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement