Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Widespread phages exhibit depth-structured infection coupled with ammonia oxidation

Created on 20 Jun 2026

Authors

Qin, Y., Li, H., Baskaran, D. K. K., Turnham, A., Coleman, M., Anantharaman, K., Chen, L.

Abstract

Ammonia oxidation is a rate-limiting step in the nitrogen cycle, yet viral contributions to this process remain largely unresolved. Here, we identify three genomically distinct groups of amoC-encoding phages (155-338 kilobases in length; termed as amoC-phages) from multiple freshwater lakes in Europe and North America, including the Laurentian Great Lakes. These phages are highly divergent in phylogeny, genome architecture, and gene content, and are predicted to infect two distinct Nitrosomonadaceae ammonia-oxidizing bacterial lineages. The placement of phage-encoded amoC genes across these divergent viral clades indicates independent acquisition of amoC. Time-series and depth-resolved metagenomes and metatranscriptomes reveal persistent and depth-structured distributions of amoC-phages and their predicted hosts, with seasonal mixing periodically reshaping their co-occurrence patterns. Furthermore, virome data from Lake Mendota show that some of the amoC-phages occur as free viral particles, supporting active viral lysis and particle redistribution along the water column. Metatranscriptomes of the Laurentian Great Lakes reveal coordinated expression of phage structural genes (e.g., major capsid protein) together with phage-encoded amoC, indicating active infection in situ. Together, these results support a framework in which amoC-phage infection is depth-structured, seasonally dynamic, and coupled to ammonia-oxidizing bacterial host activity, highlighting viruses as previously overlooked components of freshwater nitrogen cycling.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 20 Jun 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 1
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement