Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Complex interplay of biomechanics and ecology influenced crab claw morphology evolution

Created on 24 Jun 2026

Authors

Bicknell, R. D. C., Wolfe, J. M., Flynn, J. J., Klompmaker, A. A., Chase, M., Fu, P., Hopkins, M.

Abstract

True crabs (Brachyura) are among the most iconic marine arthropods, representing noteworthy examples of morphological and ecological disparity (1, 2). A striking feature of brachyurans are their anterior pincer-like appendages: chelipeds (1, 3-5). These structures showcase a large diversity of morphologies that reflect ecology and overall multifunctionality (5-7). Yet, a comprehensive assessment of appendage functional morphology within phylogenetic and ecological trait contexts has never been attempted. By combining 3D geometric morphometrics, finite element analyses, multilocus molecular phylogeny, and ecological trait data for 80 crab species, including three fossil forms, we unveil a complex evolutionary history for crab chelipeds. Despite extreme shape diversity amongst chelipeds, stress distributions are very similar across taxa and hint a many-to-one pattern (8, 9). High concentrations of chelipeds within constrained morphospace regions associated with peak pinch forces illustrates that brachyuran morphologies optimised for shell crushing may have arisen in the Cretaceous (10-12). Deviations from this morphospace highlight the diversification of non-shell-crushing life modes and the influence of sexual selection on appendages. Neither cheliped shape nor pinch force show phylogenetic signal. Together these results indicate that the evolution of cheliped shape is closely associated with, and inferred to have been strongly influenced by, crab ecology, biomechanical needs and sexual selection.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 24 Jun 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 11
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement