Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Lichen Growth Form Effects on Rock Weathering in Cold Biomes

Created on 24 Jun 2026

Authors

Ciric, E. N., De Jonge, I., Liu, R., Cornelissen, J., Convey, P., Bokhorst, S.

Abstract

Rock surface weathering is a critical element in the process of early soil formation, in which lichens are thought to play a significant role. Crustose lichens, with a large area of rock-surface contact, are generally considered more influential in rock weathering, while foliose and fruticose growth forms, with more developed three-dimensional structure and less rock-surface contact, are rarely considered in this context. Here, we test the extent to which all three growth forms contribute to granitic rock surface weathering in Maritime Antarctic ecosystems, by quantifying rock hardness beneath foliose (n = 2 species), fruticose (n = 2) and crustose lichens (n= 5). Our data confirm that foliose lichens reduced rock surface hardness by 9%, to a lesser extent than crustose and foliose lichens (40% and 31% reduction, respectively). To disentangle whether these effects result from lichen-induced weathering or lichen preference for pre-weathered rock, we also analyzed a dated deglaciation sequence on granitic rocks from the Morteratsch Glacier forefield in the Swiss Alps. At this location, the impact of crustose lichens on rock substrate hardness generally increased with time since exposure from glacial retreat and with lichen thallus size. We conclude that lichen presence on rock surfaces significantly reduces rock hardness, with crustose lichens having a greater impact than foliose and fruticose forms, highlighting the potential role of lichens of all three growth forms in driving substrate breakdown and shaping early-stage ecosystem processes in polar and alpine regions.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 24 Jun 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 15
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement