Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Minimizing methane emissions during the degradation of sewage sludge in a sulfate-rich bioreactor

Created on 25 Jun 2026

Authors

Coon, G. R., Jagoutz, O., Bosak, T.

Abstract

Simultaneous removal of organic waste and industrial gypsum was assessed in continuous flow-through bioreactors that treat sulfate-rich sewage sludge. Metabolic fluxes, the composition of microbial communities, and profiles of organic matter in the presence of different organic loads were tracked over ~190 days. The addition of a pre-enriched microbial community enhanced the rates of sulfate reduction during the establishment of the sludge blanket, but microbial diversity in established reactors depended primarily on organic loading. Organic removal rates were comparable to those in standard anaerobic digesters, but methane production accounted for ~1% of electron flow compared to >70% in traditional systems. Stoichiometric analyses revealed that molar COD: sulfate ratios below ~1 favored complete oxidation of acetate by sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) and those above ~2.1 permitted either complete or incomplete oxidation, allowing sulfate reduction and methanogenesis to co-occur. Sequencing of the 16S rRNA confirmed these trends by revealing that the faster-growing SRB that do not oxidize acetate were more abundant at higher organic loads and during the establishment of the sludge blanket, whereas complete oxidizers became more abundant when the molar COD: sulfate ratio was [≤]3.2. In reactors that had been seeded with the pre-enriched communities, acetate-oxidizing SRB became prevalent over the incomplete oxidizers 25-50 days earlier. These results enable targeted design and control of microbial processes and bioreactors that remove waste organics and gypsum while producing less methane due to the competition for acetate between methanogenic archaea and SRB that oxidize acetate.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 25 Jun 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 11
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement