Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

DextraDemixer enables accurate identification of antigen-specific T cells from pMHC multimer experiments

Created on 26 Jun 2026

Authors

An, Y., Drost, F., Bonafonte-Pardas, I., Grotz, M., Schober, K., Schubert, B.

Abstract

Antigen specificity of T cells defines the adaptive immune response, yet the vast majority of known T cell receptors (TCRs) lack annotated antigen targets. Single-cell peptide-MHC (pMHC) multimer assays offer a scalable approach to map TCR-antigen interactions. Still, their utility is limited by pervasive non-specific binding and severe overlap between signal and noise, which confound the accurate identification of antigen-specific cells. To address these limitations, we present DextraDemixer, a Bayesian hierarchical mixture model that disentangles antigen-specific T cells from background noise in pMHC multimer data. The model integrates information from negative controls and clonotype structure while providing calibrated uncertainty estimates for classification. We further introduce a dynamic thresholding scheme that enables credible interval-bounded control of the false discovery rate. Extensive benchmarking on simulated datasets and antigen-specific spike-in experiments demonstrated the model's robustness and improved accuracy over established methods. In a longitudinal SARS-CoV-2 vaccine study, DextraDemixer identified antigen-specific TCRs characterized by high sequence similarity, elevated antigen-specificity prediction scores, and strong clonal purity. Annotations showed high concordance with external validation data and supported the identification of antigen-specific motifs. Overall, DextraDemixer provides a principled probabilistic framework for reliable identification of antigen-specific TCRs from single-cell pMHC-multimer assays.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 26 Jun 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 2
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement