Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

The genomic origins and evolutionary path to a key innovation in the world's most venomous snakes

Created on 29 Jun 2026

Authors

van Thiel, J., Dowell, N., Smith, C. F., Sanchez, E. E., Carroll, S.

Abstract

Evolutionary innovation is a key driver of the colonization of new environments and the adaptive radiations of major groups. Novel traits typically evolve through the modification of pre-existing characters but the genetic paths underlying their origin have been challenging to trace, and the general requirements for and relative order of different kinds of gene mutations have been difficult to assess. Here, we trace the genomic origins of four procoagulant venom toxins (factor X, factor V, group I phospholipase A2, and Kunitz-type toxins) that collectively underlie a novel, especially potent blood-clotting venom type in the recently evolved Australian brown snake and taipan clade. We discover evidence for a previously unknown fifth toxin, coagulation factor VII, and show that the toxins evolved through two distinct genetic paths. The factor X and factor V toxins evolved through the sequential de novo co-option of ancestral clotting factor proteins that entailed their heterotopic expression in the venom gland, the fixation of segmental duplications containing each locus, and subsequent gain-of-function mutations that rendered factor X and factor V constitutively active. In contrast, the phospholipase A2 and Kunitz-type toxins evolved by modifying the functions of neurotoxins that were part of the venom arsenal. Our findings support models in which innovative mutations in single-copy genes precede gene duplication in the evolution of novel proteins and offer a rare view into the genesis of a complex trait that has played a central role in a major adaptive radiation.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 29 Jun 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 10
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement