Apparent Anatomical Variability Through Rigid Augmentation Enables Reliable Corpus Callosum Segmentation

Authors

Guimaraes, D. M., Szczupak, D., Campos, V. P., Bramati, I. E., Silva, A. C., Tovar-Moll, F.

Abstract

The corpus callosum is a major white matter bundle responsible for connecting both hemispheres. In mammals, due to a variety of causes, the development of the corpus callosum can be impaired - this brain malformation is known as corpus callosum dysgenesis (CCD). The clinical presentation of CCD varies, with patients exhibiting three morphological phenotypes: agenesis, partial dysgenesis, and hypoplasia. Although the first two presentations are easily detectable on MRI scans, the latter is more challenging, as the structure is fully formed but has a reduced area. In this study, we develop (1) a pipeline to generate synthetic MRI scans with apparent anatomical variation and (2) train a U-Net-based tool to automatically segment the corpus callosum of marmosets in both healthy and disease contexts. Methodologically, a custom script was devised to apply rotation and translation to T1-weighted MRI scans at the volume level. Because the slicing grid remains unchanged, these rigid transformations translate into apparent anatomical variations at the slice level. We compared corpus callosum measurements obtained from automatically segmented masks with those from manually delineated masks. The average Dice score was above 0.90, and the Hausdorff distance was below 0.4 mm. We also stratified our cohort according to phenotype (healthy controls and hypoplastic animals). The magnitude of the effect and the significance level observed between the voxel counts of healthy and hypoplastic animals using manually delineated masks were comparable to those obtained via automatic segmentations. These results show that our pipeline can generate a sufficiently varied training pool to build an accurate U-Net segmentation model with high diagnostic capability.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 30 Jun 2026.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.