AnimalTA: A simple yet flexible tool for video tracking and manual corrections.

Authors

Chiara, V., Buatois, A., Kim, S.-Y.

Abstract

1. Video-tracking programs have now become an essential tool for researchers measuring animal behavior across biological fields. The panel of available programs is growing rapidly, providing researchers with numerous specific tools that will match their precise needs. However, their proliferation may complicate post-tracking data processing, and some programs do not even provide tools for correcting tracking errors or analysing tracking data. In the case of commercial software, the loss of access to a program due to budget limitations or researchers' mobility from one institution to another could prevent them from accessing and visualizing their tracking data. 2. There is therefore a growing need for an accessible and flexible tool to handle post-tracking processes such as the correction and analysis of tracking data obtained across different video-tracking programs. 3. We present here the latest update of the video tracking and analysis program AnimalTA. With this new release, we propose to solve the above-mentioned problems by providing the scientific community with a program that will allow for data importation from other video-tracking programs. Like in its previous versions, AnimalTA remains a free, open-source, and highly user-friendly program, ensuring that it will always be accessible without restriction. Now, with this new importation option, users who performed their tracking with other programs can benefit from AnimalTA's complete toolset of data visualization, correction, and analysis. 4. Finally, this article gives an overview of the other main improvements associated with this new release. The program is now faster in both video importation and tracking, proposes an amplified toolset for data visualisation and correction, and features new options for data analysis.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 01 Jul 2026.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.