Effects of aging on multiple object tracking under normal and altered viewing conditions

Authors

Michaud, C., Baures, R., Soler, V., Trotter, Y., Vattier, V., Rosito, M., Peyrin, C., Cottereau, B. R.

Abstract

Multiple object tracking (MOT) is a core function of dynamic visual attention that relies on the ability to simultaneously monitor several moving objects. Although MOT performance is known to decline with age, and to depend on efficient oculomotor strategies, how these processes interact across the adult lifespan and under degraded visual input remains poorly understood. Here, we examined the effects of aging on MOT under normal and gaze-contingent viewing conditions simulating central and peripheral visual field loss. Sixty participants aged 20-80 years completed a MOT task while eye movements were recorded, enabling characterization of performance and oculomotor behavior across five viewing conditions. Behavioral results revealed a continuous decline in tracking performance across adulthood, indicating a graded rather than categorical effect of age. Performance was strongly reduced by visual-field restrictions, with the largest impairments under central vision occlusion. Eye-tracking analyses showed that better performance was associated with greater reliance on centroid-based gaze strategies, consistent with distributed monitoring of target configurations. Critically, older adults relied more on focal, target-based tracking under conditions simulating peripheral vision loss, and less on centroid-based strategies; this shift was associated with poorer performance. In contrast, oculomotor behavior during full-field viewing was largely preserved across age. Together, these findings suggest that aging affects multiple object tracking through combined sensory, attentional, and oculomotor mechanisms. Beyond a reduction in capacity, age-related decline also reflects systematic changes in visual sampling strategies during dynamic tracking.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 01 Jul 2026.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.