Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Novel human monoclonal antibodies with enhanced sensitivity for lipoarabinomannan antigens present in urines of TB patients

Created on 02 Jul 2026

Authors

Choudhary, A. K., Patel, D., Honnen, W., Kolloli, A., Reichman, C., Kaur, K., Zheng, R. B., Nakabugo, E., Nasinghe, E., Nakiyingi, L., Lowary, T., Pinter, A.

Abstract

Lipoarabinomannan (LAM) is a useful biomarker for detection of M. tuberculosis infection and disease. Related antigens can be detected in urine samples of TB patients by combinations of monoclonal anti-bodies (mAbs) directed against specific epitopes expressed in LAM. While sensitive for samples from patients with active TB disease who have HIV-1 co-infections, these assays are less effective for other populations, and there is therefore a need for more sensitive antibodies that can improve the sensitivity of these assays. Here we characterize the antigen and epitope specificities, sequence diversity and isotype dependencies of eight LAM-specific human mAbs that target five distinct arabinose- and man-nose-dependent epitopes present in LAM and lipoarabinomannan (LM). Whereas all of the mAbs rec-ognized ManLAM, only a few, including A194-01, consistently detected antigens in TB+ urine samples. Converting A194-01 from the IgG1 to the IgM isotype resulted in broader recognition of poly-Ara glycan epitopes, and increased sensitivity for clinical antigens when combined with several capture reagents, including RU95-C1, a novel antibody targeting the mannan domain of LAM. These results define novel epitopes that are differentially expressed in bacterial and urinary forms of LAM, and identify novel anti-body combinations which possess enhanced diagnostic utility for clinical forms of LAM.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 02 Jul 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 2
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement