Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Photosynthesis-derived carbon gates cell cycle activation to enable hormone-autonomous shoot regeneration

Created on 03 Jul 2026

Authors

Ince, Y., Takebayashi, A., Iwase, A., Johanna, K., Chetelat, A., Aida, M., Veylder, L., Sugimoto, K.

Abstract

Shoot regeneration is a powerful model for cell fate reprogramming but how it occurs in nature remains poorly understood because studies in Arabidopsis thaliana conventionally rely on in vitro assays supplemented with exogenous hormones and sugars. In this study, we established the Hormone-autonomY Direct Regeneration Assay (HYDRA) in which removal of the shoot apical meristem (SAM) initiates shoot regeneration from the cotyledon-hypocotyl boundary domain without hormone or sugar supplementation. We show that photosynthesis-derived carbon and the boundary domain are two separable but convergent requirements for shoot regeneration in HYDRA. Carbon availability increases in the boundary domain where it activates cell cycle progression via the RETINOBLASTOMA-RELATED1 (RBR1) pathway. Carbon deprivation blocks regeneration despite induction of SAM marker genes, indicating that carbon-dependent cell cycle activation is a limiting factor for regeneration. In parallel, perturbation of the boundary domain or its regulators reduces regeneration despite sufficient carbon, indicating that boundary domain identity is independently required. Additionally, exogenous carbon supply overcomes the requirement for SAM removal to induce shoot formation, indicating that carbon availability also acts as an initiation cue. Together, this study reveals an inherent capacity for hormone-autonomous shoot regeneration and identifies photosynthesis-derived carbon as a central regulator of this process.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 03 Jul 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 6
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement