Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Using spIsoNet to address the preferred-orientation problem in cryoEM reconstructions

Created on 04 Jul 2026

Authors

Fan, H., Liu, Y.-T., Zhou, Z. H.

Abstract

Cryogenic electron microscopy (cryoEM) is now routinely used for high-resolution structure determination of biological macromolecules. However, many biological specimens exhibit varying degrees of preferred orientation on cryoEM grids, resulting in uneven sampling of three-dimensional Fourier space. This orientation bias produces anisotropic reconstruction artifacts and, in severe cases, can exacerbate particle misalignment during iterative refinement, thereby limiting the success rate of near-atomic resolution cryoEM structure determination. This protocol provides a practical guide for applying spIsoNet, a self-supervised deep-learning method, to mitigate preferred-orientation issues in cryoEM reconstructions. We describe two complementary workflows: (1) map Anisotropy Correction to correct anisotropic artifacts of cryoEM maps and (2) particle Misalignment Correction, which integrates spIsoNet with RELION external reconstruction to improve particle-pose estimation. We demonstrate these workflows using two influenza hemagglutinin (HA) trimer datasets representing moderate and severe degrees of preferred-orientation bias. The protocol includes installation instructions, parameter-selection guidance, quality-control checkpoints and troubleshooting advice, and can typically be completed in ~7 hours on a workstation equipped with four NVIDIA A100 GPUs. Together, these workflows provide step-by-step guidance for using the open-source spIsoNet software to mitigate the preferred-orientation problem directly from experimental data.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 04 Jul 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 8
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement