Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Complementary frontoparietal and corticothalamic contributions to relational reasoning

Created on 05 Jul 2026

Authors

Robinson, C. N., Hearne, L. J., Iyer, K. K., Ito, T., Roberts, J. A., Cocchi, L.

Abstract

Complex reasoning depends on flexible coordination among frontal, parietal, and thalamic systems, but the circuit mechanisms that support increasing relational demands remain unclear. We combined EEG with biologically grounded corticothalamic neural field modelling while participants solved relational problems of graded complexity. Successful reasoning was associated with dissociable frontoparietal dynamics. Frontal regions showed increased theta-band power, whereas parietal regions showed reduced alpha- and beta-band power. Theta-band phase synchronisation across frontoparietal-network nodes increased with problem complexity but was not associated with performance. By contrast, stronger beta-band synchronisation across the same network was associated with slower and less accurate responses as demands approached the highest complexity, suggesting that stronger coordination is not uniformly beneficial. Neural field modelling indicated that these regional spectral dynamics reflected specific complexity-dependent circuit adaptations. Parietal regions showed modulation of intracortical and corticothalamic gains, intrathalamic inhibition, prolonged loop delays, and faster synaptic filtering, whereas frontal regions primarily adjusted intracortical gains to maintain local excitatory-inhibitory balance and supported longer temporal integration windows. Together, these empirical and model-derived findings reveal complementary frontoparietal and corticothalamic mechanisms for relational reasoning.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 05 Jul 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 6
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement