How Robust are Multispecies Coalescent Species Delimitations in Taxonomically Complex Systems? A Genomic Assessment Using Mediterranean Tethya Sponges

Authors

van der Sprong, J., Cardone, F., Hoehna, S., Schaetzle, S., Deister, F., Erpenbeck, D., Woerheide, G., Vargas, S.

Abstract

Reliable species delimitation underpins biodiversity assessment but remains difficult for organisms with plastic morphology and few diagnostic characters. Multispecies coalescent (MSC) methods can delimit species from genomic data, yet they are rarely tested in taxonomically complex, marine invertebrate groups where they are arguably most needed. We used the three Mediterranean species of the genus Tethya, a rare, well-characterised system within the otherwise taxonomically difficult phylum Porifera-distinguished by multiple independent morphological and ecological characters-to evaluate how robust MSC-based delimitation is in such groups. Analysing 64 single-copy nuclear loci in BEAST2 and BPP, we compared constrained, hypothesis-testing approaches (BFD*, BFdriver, A10) with freer, heuristic ones (SPEEDEMON, A11), and examined their sensitivity to data type, clock model, priors, and the species-collapse threshold. All methods recovered the three recognised Mediterranean species, but the resolution of within-lineage structure was method-dependent. The hypothesis-testing approaches consistently supported six lineages, robustly across data types and model assumptions, whereas the heuristic approaches proved less stable. Configurations without a priori species hypotheses often failed to converge or were computationally intractable, a problem compounded by the relaxed clock. In SPEEDEMON the outcome changed with the collapse threshold. Because our system lacks an independent reference point to calibrate this threshold, any delimitation based on it is poorly constrained. We conclude that constrained, hypothesis-testing delimitation is the most robust and reproducible MSC approach, yielding a quantitative, model-based hypothesis that can be weighed against other lines of evidence to inform taxonomic decisions. By clarifying how these methods behave and how their outcomes should be interpreted, our study offers a practical guide for researchers working on comparably complex systems.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 07 Jul 2026.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.