Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Accelerated Measurement of Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer by Accordion NMR Spectroscopy

Created on 07 Jul 2026

Authors

Carlstrom, G., Hofurthner, T., Akke, M.

Abstract

Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) has become an indispensable NMR method to characterize slow exchange affecting biomacromolecules, especially for cases involving exchange between a major state and a minor state, the latter of which is often invisible in the spectrum. The CEST method is based on successive irradiation of selective regions of the NMR spectrum using a weak radiofrequency field, B1, while observing the effect on the visible major state when the B1 field saturates the invisible minor state. The need for selective saturation of narrow spectral regions has to date required acquisition of many tens of two-dimensional CEST spectra to sample the entire spectrum with sufficient resolution. Here we present the ACCEST method which measures an entire CEST profile from a single two-dimensional accordion-CEST spectrum plus a reference spectrum. ACCEST is based on the concept of accordion spectroscopy, where in the present implementation the carrier frequency of the weak saturating B1 field is stepped in synchrony with the dwell-time incrementation in the indirect dimension of the two-dimensional spectrum. We benchmarked ACCEST against conventional CEST, resulting in excellent agreement for both backbone 15N and methyl 13C CEST profiles. ACCEST offers substantial time savings that scale linearly with the number of spectra required in the corresponding conventional CEST experiment. Thus, ACCEST can dramatically speed up lengthy serial experiments, such as ligand titrations or temperature-dependent studies, and enable studies of non-equilibrium systems or samples with limited lifetimes.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 07 Jul 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 6
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement