Structural connectivity of auditory-linguistic brain networks predicts success in speech categorization and listening in noise

Authors

Rizzi, R., Stirn, J. R., Eisenhut, Z., Bidelman, G. M.

Abstract

Successful speech perception requires listeners to bin continuous acoustic information into discrete phonetic categories. However, some people maintain within-category acoustic information (gradient) while others discard category-irrelevant information (discrete) during perception. Listeners also vary in how consistently they label speech sounds and more gradient/consistent labeling has been linked with better speech-in-noise (SIN) perception. Here, we test how neuroanatomical properties of the brain's major speech-language and auditory pathways relate to individual differences in speech categorization and SIN processing. We measured phonetic categorization and SIN comprehension via phoneme labeling and QuickSIN tasks. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with probabilistic tractography estimated axonal density within the bilateral arcuate fasciculi and brainstem-cortical auditory projections. Anatomical morphology (surface area, gray matter volume, thickness) was also quantified in the adjacent frontotemporal cortical areas and midbrain. Behaviorally, we found more consistent categorizers had better performance on the QuickSIN. DWI showed that more gradient listeners had greater white matter density in the left arcuate fasciculus and brainstem-cortical auditory pathways, while better SIN performance was predicted by denser white matter in the brainstem-cortical auditory pathways. Morphometric results revealed more consistent listening was associated with greater cortical thickness in right superior temporal gyrus and more gradient listening was associated with greater surface area in right pars opercularis. We infer that individual differences in phonetic categorization relate to SIN comprehension and are at least partially explained by neuroanatomical properties of the auditory-linguistic brain.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 08 Jul 2026.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.