Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

The ID93 + GLA-3M-052-LS vaccine candidate elicits mucosal and systemic immunogenicity and protective efficacy against Mycobacterium tuberculosis challenge in BCG-primed Collaborative Cross inbred mice

Created on 02 Nov 2025

Authors

Voigt, E. A., Alsharaydeh, A., Kasal, D. N., Jennewein, M. F., Brandt, D. S., Lin, S., Singh, J., Bakken, J., Mohamath, R., Fusco, P., Torrelles, J. B., Beamer, G., Fox, C. B.

Abstract

New vaccine approaches are needed against tuberculosis (TB). We sought to optimize mucosal immunogenicity and protective efficacy by modulating the adjuvant component and route of immunization of a next-generation TB vaccine using the recombinant TB vaccine antigen (Ag) ID93. ID93-specific mucosal and systemic immunogenicity and protective efficacy were assessed in the Collaborative Cross 004 mouse strain, a mouse strain susceptible to Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) infection, as a suitable model of Mtb susceptible populations. Immunogenicity data from various vaccine candidates were used to select lead vaccine candidates with the most preferred immunostimulatory profiles using a pre-determined desirability index. A liposomal adjuvant system containing synthetic TLR4 and TLR7/8 ligands (GLA-3M-052-LS), administered by a heterologous intramuscular-intranasal regimen, induced an optimal comprehensive immune response profile including high levels of mucosal antibody and Th1 CD4+ T cells in the lungs. In BCG-primed mice, immunization with intramuscular followed by intranasal ID93 + GLA-3M-052-LS boosts significantly reduced Mtb burden in the lungs after challenge vs. BCG vaccinated mice alone. Thus, ID93 + GLA-3M-052-LS represents a promising next-generation TB vaccine candidate suitable for testing in additional preclinical models.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 02 Nov 2025.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 54
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement