Authors
Ji, Y., Ji, Q., Ji, J., Shentu, Y., Zhou, l., Wu, J., Shao, Q., Xu, W., Zhang, C., Shen, M., Xie, Q.
Abstract
Lipophilic dyes are widely used to track extracellular vesicles (EVs), yet their labeling efficiency toward bona fide small EVs (sEVs) remains poorly defined. Here, we critically reassess this efficiency using a serum-free HEK293F system that generates endogenously fluorescent protein-tagged sEVs (sEVs-FPT) as an unambiguous positive reference, thereby minimizing interference from co-isolated, dye-labelable non-vesicular extracellular particles (NVEPs). Two orthogonal methods, nanoflow cytometry and fluorescence microscopy, were employed for cross-validation. We found that PKH26, PKH67, and DiD labeled <0.5% of sEVs-FPT, regardless of vesicle heterogeneity. In vivo tracking confirmed that dye-derived signals were far weaker than FPT signals and strikingly failed to colocalize with them. Preliminary mechanistic evidence indicates that this failure is due to an inability of sEVs to actively internalize dye aggregates. Our findings raise serious concerns about the validity of lipophilic dye-based EV tracking and call for a critical reevaluation of the relevant literature.
Preprint server:
bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 09 Jul 2026.
Advertisement
Stats
- Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
- Views 9
- Comments 0