Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Nox4 Mediates Diastolic Function in a Genetic Model of Pitx2 Haploinsufficiency

Created on 10 Jul 2026

Authors

Gardner, S., Fatima, A., Abusharkh, F., Kobeck, E., Basu, C., Miller, F. J., Agrawal, V.

Abstract

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) commonly coexists with atrial fibrillation (AF), but shared mechanisms remain unclear. In this study, we hypothesized that Pitx2, a transcription factor located near the strongest genetic locus associated with AF in humans, increases susceptibility to HFpEF-like remodeling. We also sought to understand pathways that might be central to this increased risk. Male and female Pitx2+/- mice and wild-type littermates received 3-week subcutaneous osmotic pump infusion of saline or angiotensin II (Ang II; 500 ng/kg/min). Cardiac structure and function were assessed by echocardiography and catheterization, and functional capacity by exercise treadmill. RNA transcriptomic profiling was performed to identify candidate pathways. In a separate cohort, Ang II-treated mice were randomized to oral GKT136901 (30 mg/kg/day) or vehicle during infusion. After Ang II infusion, Pitx2+/- mice developed exaggerated HFpEF-like changes, including greater left ventricular hypertrophy, left atrial enlargement, diastolic dysfunction, elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, and reduced treadmill performance. RNA-seq showed enrichment of metabolic and stress-response pathways with selective upregulation of Nox4, confirmed by RT-qPCR. GKT136901 attenuated structural remodeling, diastolic dysfunction indices, elevated filling pressures, and cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, but did not improve endurance. These findings implicate redox signaling, including Nox4, in AF genetic susceptibility-HFpEF interactions.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 10 Jul 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 2
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement