Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Automatic measurement of temporalis muscle thickness from CT head scans using deep learning

Created on 02 Nov 2025

Authors

Hernandez, A. N., Korhonen, T. K., Pesonen, E. K., Tetri, S., Pikkarainen, L., Pertuz, S., Arponen, O.

Abstract

Objective: To construct and validate a deep-learning (DL) model for the automatic quantification of temporalis muscle thickness (TMT) in CT head scans. Materials and methods: We developed and evaluated the performance of a DL-based method for the measurement of temporalis muscle thickness using publicly available CT head scans. Reference standard TMT was established using a previously published measurement protocol, applied on 198 CT head scans obtained from a publicly available database, originally collected from various radiology centers within one city in 2017. A DL landmark detection model was trained to measure the temporalis muscle thickness. The absolute error and correlation between DL-based and reference standard TMT measurements were calculated. Additionally, the ability of the DL-based measurements to stratify subjects into low TMT vs normal TMT groups was assessed using the metrics of specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy. Results: The median reference TMT value was 6.0 mm (95% CI: 5.4, 6.5); the median DL-based TMT value was 5.8 mm (95% CI: 5.6, 6.3). The mean absolute error for TMT was 0.7 mm (95% CI: 0.6, 0.9). The correlation coefficient between reference and DL-based TMT was 0.9 (95% CI: 0.8, 0.9). The DL-based measurements classified the patients into low and normal TMT groups with sensitivity of 84.2%, specificity of 85.0% and accuracy of 84.6%. Conclusions: Our DL-based pipeline allows for fully automated and reproducible quantification of temporal muscle thickness and patient stratification into low and normal TMT groups.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 02 Nov 2025.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 35
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement