Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Neurophysiological Evidence for Reduced Use of Prior Sound Patterns to Shape Speech Processing in Autism

Created on 11 Jul 2026

Authors

Lau, J. C. Y., McHaney, J. R., Goldman, L., Robinshaw, K., Mou, F., McFarlane, K., Chandrasekaran, B., Losh, M.

Abstract

Reported perceptual differences in autism may arise from reduced use of prior context to shape incoming sensory input. Speech perception provides a critical test of this account because stable perception requires listeners to integrate variable acoustic signals with contextual expectations. This study examined context-dependent modulation of speech encoding in autistic and non-autistic adults using the frequency-following response (FFR), a neurophysiological measure of phase-locked auditory encoding. Participants heard English intonational pitch contours presented in repetitive and variable contexts while EEG was recorded. Principal component analysis of FFR metrics yielded components indexing neural encoding fidelity and timing. Non-autistic participants showed enhanced encoding fidelity in more predictable contexts, whereas autistic participants showed reduced context-dependent modulation. Neural encoding timing also showed divergent context effects across groups, suggesting altered balance between feedback-based predictive mechanisms and locally driven adaptation processes. Within the autistic group, greater context-related modulation of encoding fidelity was associated with lower ADOS-2 Social Affect severity but poorer speech-in-noise perception, suggesting that the functional impact of contextual modulation depends on input reliability and task demands. These findings indicate that context-dependent modulation of speech encoding is altered in autism and may contribute to individual differences in auditory and social-communicative function.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 11 Jul 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement