Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Short-term methionine starvation induces de novo diurnal oscillations of hepatic m6A RNA methylation

Created on 11 Jul 2026

Authors

Liu, Y., Chrysovergis, K., Johnson, K. L., Williams, J. G., Lih, F. B., Deterding, L. J., Grimm, S. A., Wade, P. A.

Abstract

Dietary methionine restriction has been shown to improve metabolic health and treat multiple diseases. Methionine metabolism regulates transmethylation reactions, including N6-methyladenosine (m6A) RNA methylation, by modulating the availability of S-adenosyl methionine (SAM). Both m6A RNA methylation and methionine metabolism are involved in the regulation of the circadian clock. However, it remains unclear whether dietary methionine influences circadian rhythms through the regulation of m6A RNA modification. In this study, we investigated the effects of short-term methionine deprivation on the diurnal oscillations of m6A RNA methylation in the mouse liver. We found that a methionine-deficient (MD) diet reprogrammed the cyclic expression patterns of m6A writers, erasers, and readers. Methylated RNA immunoprecipitation sequencing (MeRIP-seq) revealed that the MD diet induced de novo diurnal m6A oscillations in genes associated with RNA processing, protein translation, protein ubiquitination, and mTORC1 signaling pathways. RNA-seq and quantitative proteomics analyses demonstrated that MD-induced changes in m6A RNA levels were linked to alterations in mRNA and protein abundance. We observed that dynamic m6A RNA methylation of the transcripts encoding two key enzymes, MAT2A and CBS, helps maintain methionine homeostasis in response to methionine starvation. These findings identify m6A RNA methylation as a key mechanism linking methionine metabolism to circadian regulation.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 11 Jul 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 4
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement