Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Kernelized approach enables explainable gene prioritizations for complex traits

Created on 11 Jul 2026

Authors

Tan, T., Samee, M. A. H.

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified numerous variant-trait associations; yet, assigning effector genes to GWAS loci remains challenging. Similarity-based machine-learning methods, such as PoPS, prioritize effector genes from shared functional profiles among trait-relevant genes. These models assign a prioritization score for each gene and nominate a single effector gene within a GWAS locus. However, the scores provide limited insight into why a gene was prioritized or whether the nomination is biologically plausible. To address this gap, we introduce Kernelized Polygenic Priority Score, K-PoPS, a kernelized reformulation of PoPS that enables gene-centric explanations by decomposing each prediction into contributions from training genes. For each prioritized gene, K-PoPS reports top contributor genes and an anchor score that quantifies support from a user-defined set of trait-relevant genes. Across 38 Pan-UK Biobank traits, the full-feature OLS implementation underlying K-PoPS improved closest-gene enrichment relative to default PoPS for 26 of 37 evaluable traits. Across 25 traits with curated anchor sets, predictions supported by anchor scores were more enriched for closest-gene proxies than unsupported predictions. When applying to blood level apolipoprotein B, K-PoPS nominated SCARB1 over UBC gene, and further provided convincing explanations that support this prediction. Using explanation evidence, K-PoPS identified multiple plausible effector genes within a dilated cardiomyopathy locus, contrary to the parsimonious assumption. In summary, K-PoPS provides a post hoc framework for examining and interpreting GWAS effector-gene nominations.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 11 Jul 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 9
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement