Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Enhanced proteome relative quantification using refined quantotypic spectral libraries

Created on 11 Jul 2026

Authors

Barnes, B. A., Alharbi, H., Unwin, R.

Abstract

Plasma proteomics is used for a variety of applications including biomarker discovery, disease monitoring, and drug development. Data-independent acquisition (DIA) has vastly improved the breadth of proteins that are identified from samples; however, given challenges in reproducibility and translation, it is critical that the quantitative performance of these methods is reliable. Analysis of global proteomics data typically incorporates information from all detected peptides. However, some peptides do not reflect their parent protein amount, due to irreproducible digestion, modification, analytical interferences or instability. We hypothesise that including these peptides impacts protein relative quantification, and thus, a refined spectral library containing only quantitatively representative peptides provides superior protein quantification. By analysing a defined multi-species spike-in model, we show that refining a plasma spectral library by removing precursors that fail to meet quality control metrics (25.4% of all identified precursors) reduces noise and variability, improving precision, accuracy and differential abundance analysis by up to ~11%, with minimal identification losses and substantial reduction in computational demand. This demonstrates proof-of-concept that refining spectral libraries produces results that prioritize quantification quality over quantity. This approach could enable development of universal tissue-specific refined spectral libraries able to improve quantification quality with easy implementation and minimal processing time.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 11 Jul 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 7
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement