Comparing Harmonization Approaches for Protocol-Related Variability in Multisite Diffusion MRI Data

Authors

Liou, K., Thomopoulos, S. I., Villalon Reina, J. E., Yoo, H., Shuai, Y., Chehrzadeh, S., Arani, A., Borowski, B., Reid, R. I., Vemuri, P., Jack, C. R., Weiner, M., Jahanshad, N., Thompson, P. M., Nir, T. M.

Abstract

Diffusion MRI (dMRI) enables assessment of white matter microstructural abnormalities in Alzheimer's disease (AD), and multisite datasets enable more robust modeling of non-biological variation that can confound analyses. The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) includes over 10 dMRI protocols, necessitating robust methods to model protocol-related variability when pooling data. Here, we compared three harmonization approaches: (1) mixed-effects models, (2) ComBat-GAM, and (3) eHarmonize, a reference-based lifespan method. We assessed their ability to reduce protocol-related variability in diffusion tensor imaging fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) while preserving associations with cognitive impairment (CI), and amyloid-beta (A{beta}) and tau PET burden in 1,086 ADNI3/4 participants. All approaches yielded more closely aligned FA/MD distributions across protocols. Associations with clinical indicators of CI were highly consistent across approaches, whereas PET associations were less widespread and more variable. Overall, multiple strategies effectively modeled protocol-related variability while preserving AD-related associations.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 12 Jul 2026.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.