Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Biocontainment attenuation of mobile DNA host range in a wastewater microbiome

Created on 15 Jul 2026

Authors

Selinidis, M. A., Seamons, T., Stadler, L. B., Silberg, J. J., Chappell, J.

Abstract

Biocontainment systems designed to attenuate the spread of mobile DNA are challenging to evaluate within microbiomes of engineered environments. To better understand how toxin-based biocontainment systems affect horizontal gene transfer (HGT) in a microbiome, we evaluated the host range of pairs of plasmids using orthogonal catalytic RNA (cat-RNA) that amend distinct barcodes to 16S rRNA following HGT. We show that mobilizable (5 kb) and self-mobilizable (60 kb) plasmids, which use the same RP4 transfer machinery but different origins of replication, overlap in their host range when conjugated in parallel into a wastewater community, with 127 of the 143 amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) presenting barcoding signals from both plasmids (89%). We also find that mobilizable plasmids with or without the Escherichia coli CcdB toxin overlap in host range in a wastewater community. Among the two most abundant orders, CcdB attenuated the barcoding signal in Aeromonadales more consistently than Enterobacteriales, which have F plasmids containing the CcdB-CcdA toxin-antitoxin system used for biocontainment. Also, CcdB decreased the abundance of the mobilizable plasmid by >100-fold and yielded mutations in 85% of the reads. Together, these findings reveal how pairs of plasmids expressing orthogonal cat-RNA can be used to monitor the effects of plasmid-encoded traits on mobile DNA persistence following HGT. They also highlight challenges when using biocontainment systems containing genes related to those found in the microbiomes targeted for engineering.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 15 Jul 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 8
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement