Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

DPCGS: a computational framework for linking GWAS to single-cell transcriptomics in complex traits and diseases

Created on 21 Jul 2026

Authors

Liu, C., Shen, B., Li, J., Zhu, R., Yang, P., Wu, B., Xuan, Y., Yang, S., Yuan, B., Yang, N., Ma, L., Liu, Q., Dai, S., Zhang, Y.

Abstract

Complex traits and diseases arise from the interplay between genetic variation and cellular heterogeneity, making it essential to understand how genetic risk manifests at the cellular level. However, connecting genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to specific cell populations remains challenging due to cellular complexity and the prevalence of noncoding variants. Here, we present DPCGS, a computational framework that systematically integrates GWAS summary statistics with single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) data to identify trait-associated cell populations, genes, and regulatory programs. DPCGS is based on the principle that GWAS-prioritized genes should exhibit elevated expression in relevant cells compared with matched controls. Benchmark analyses with simulated datasets showed that DPCGS consistently outperforms existing methods, achieving higher accuracy and sensitivity in detecting trait-relevant cells. Applications to diverse scRNA-seq datasets further validated its robustness, revealing oligodendrocytes and astrocytes as key subpopulations in Alzheimer's disease and macrophages and B cells in asthma. These analyses also highlighted potential molecular regulators, including CD74, FOS, FLI1, and AP-1 transcription factors. Together, these findings establish DPCGS as a versatile framework for dissecting the cellular and molecular basis of complex traits and diseases, with broad implications for biomarker discovery and therapeutic development.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 21 Jul 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 28
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement