Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

A non-invasive method of air pollutant exposure in an avian model of development

Created on 25 Jul 2026

Authors

Garner, D. R., Clarke, S., Durrans, J. L., Stafford, P., Herigstad, M.

Abstract

Air pollution is a growing public health concern. The developing fetus is particularly vulnerable, with exposure during pregnancy linked to negative developmental health outcomes. Teratogenic studies rely on the use of model organisms, such as the chick embryo, a well-established model of human development. However, existing protocols for the exposure of chick embryos to gaseous and aerosol pollutants have financial and technical limitations. Here, we present a novel, non-invasive method for the long-term exposure of chicken embryos to a gaseous toxin, carbon monoxide (CO). Exposure is performed inside airtight incubation boxes, which can be used in a standard laboratory incubator. We demonstrate reliable dosing of precise internal CO concentrations up to 200ppm, using a simple volumetric approach. Following optimization of key incubation parameters, temperature and turning frequency, we determined the impact of the system on embryo viability and development. Closed box incubation caused minor developmental delay but had no effect on chick embryo viability. Internal oxygen concentrations remained above hypoxic levels. No significant effects of exposure up to 200ppm CO were observed on embryo viability, weight or developmental stage. In conclusion, we present a non-invasive, affordable, accessible and technically straightforward exposure method for air pollutant teratogenicity studies. This method can be applied to other model systems and organisms beyond the chick embryo as well as to other gaseous and aerosol toxins. Thus, the system offers a suitable platform for future research on teratogenic doses, mechanisms and effects of air pollutants.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 25 Jul 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 11
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement