Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Photosynthetic assimilate determines branch size and biomass more than branch number in Arabidopsis

Created on 31 Jul 2026

Authors

Park, S., Finlayson, S. A., Li, C.

Abstract

Shoot branching is a primary determinant of plant form and crop yield, yet whether auxin or carbon supply is the proximal regulator of branching remains contested. In Arabidopsis, an earlier report that exogenous auxin fails to restore apical dominance after decapitation has been taken to weaken the case for auxin, and several studies have proposed that sugars are the primary regulator. Resolving this has been difficult because most perturbations of sugar status also disturb auxin. Here, we revisit the control of Arabidopsis branching using well-controlled, largely unperturbed plants and approaches designed to isolate each pathway. Contrary to the earlier report, apically applied auxin restored the suppression of rosette branching after decapitation, placing Arabidopsis in line with other species. In a dataset of 718 plants, cauline and rosette branching were weakly but significantly negatively correlated, consistent with a polar-auxin-transport-based model and contrary to a previous conclusion of no relationship. Removing all rosette leaves at bolting slowed bud growth but did not alter the final number of branches. Varying photosynthetic photon flux density across six natural accessions, analyzed by piecewise structural equation modeling, showed that photoassimilate acted far more strongly on the mass deposited into branches than on whether a bud initiates a branch. We conclude that auxin remains a major regulator of apical dominance in Arabidopsis, and that photosynthetic assimilate, while required as a substrate for branch growth, contributes little to determining branch number but more to branch size and biomass.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 31 Jul 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 11
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement