Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Exosome-Derived Proteomic Signatures Highlight Pathogenic Mechanisms in Moyamoya Disease

Created on 31 Jul 2026

Authors

Gupta, T., Bharti, R., Devi, V., Kumar, M., Aggarwal, A., Maras, J. S.

Abstract

Background: The etiology and molecular mechanisms of Moyamoya disease (MMD) remain unclear. Exosomes, as carriers of bioactive molecules, may reflect disease-specific alterations and serve as potential biomarkers. This study aimed to investigate disease mechanisms using proteomic profiling of serum-derived exosomes (SDEs) in MMD. Materials and Methods: Peripheral blood each from 15 MMD patients and 15 healthy-controls were used to isolate SDEs via ultracentrifugation. Proteins from pooled SDEs were extracted, digested, and analyzed by LC-MS/MS. Differentially expressed proteins were examined using MetaboAnalyst, DAVID, Enrichr, STRING, and Cytoscape. Key targets were validated at transcript and protein levels using RT-qPCR and ELISA in independent cohorts. Results: A total of 2,554 proteins were identified, with 213 showing differential expression (118 upregulated, 95 downregulated; p [≤] 0.05). Functional and pathway analyses revealed enrichment in angiogenesis, cytoskeletal remodeling, and endothelial signaling. PRKG2 and MYC were upregulated, while RHOA was downregulated, highlighting their involvement in focal adhesion and PI3K-AKT pathways. Validation confirmed these findings. Conclusion: Dysregulated proteins were linked to RHOA-ROCK and PI3K-Akt signaling, suggesting their role in driving VSMC phenotypic switching, contributing to vascular occlusion. These findings indicate that altered exosomal-proteins may participate in maladaptive vascular remodeling, although the initial trigger for VSMC transition remains unknown.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 31 Jul 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 11
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement