Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Multifaceted and evolutionarily dynamic interactions between Caenorhabditis elegans SPO-11 and its cofactors ensure proper formation of meiotic DNA double-strand breaks

Created on 03 Aug 2026

Authors

Kameda, K., Zhou, L., Matsubayashi, N., Rodriguez-Reza, C. M., Lin, M., Li, X., Yoshioka, T., Sato-Carlton, A., Carlton, P. M.

Abstract

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) generated during meiotic prophase by the topoisomerase-like protein SPO11 are essential to create crossovers between homologous chromosomes. Since crossovers are required to biorient chromosomes at the first meiotic division, DSB formation is essential for meiosis in most sexually-reproducing organisms. Since excess DSBs have the potential to destabilize the genome, SPO-11 activity must be strictly regulated by many cofactors. Recent studies have established that SPO11 must dimerize to cut DNA, whereas soluble SPO11 and SPO11-TOPOVIBL complexes are predominantly monomeric (1, 2). This contrast suggested that a major role of SPO11 cofactors could be to promote SPO11 dimerization, through means such as increasing local concentration or co-orienting SPO11 protomers. However, the mechanism of this regulation is not well-understood. Here, by taking advantage of phylogenomic analysis in the nematode genus Caenorhabditis, we show that the conserved cofactor DSB-1Rec114 evolved to replace TOPOVIBL function in C. elegans. We provide genetic and biochemical evidence that multiple interactions between SPO-11 and DSB-1 stabilize protein complex formation and promote SPO-11 dimerization. Our results shed light on the regulatory mechanism of programmed DSB formation, which ensures crossover formation and meiotic chromosome segregation while protecting genomic stability.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 03 Aug 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 8
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement