Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Long-Term Functional and Histological Outcomes Following Sutureless Peripheral Nerve Repair Using Nerve Tape in Pigs

Created on 05 Aug 2026

Authors

Tatarchuk, M. M., Clizbe, D. R., Browne, K. D., Howard, S., Ghenbot, Y., Zager, E. L., Cullen, D. K., Burrell, J. C.

Abstract

Severe peripheral nerve injuries result in incomplete recovery despite neurorrhaphy. Microsurgical suturing is technically demanding, time-intensive, and may produce variable fascicular alignment. Nerve Tape is an FDA-approved sutureless device enabling rapid, reproducible nerve coaptation. This study compared Nerve Tape with epineurial microsuturing following common peroneal nerve transection in Yucatan minipigs. Over 12 months, both groups demonstrated reinnervation of the tibialis anterior and extensor digitorum brevis, representing proximal and distal muscle targets, respectively. Tibialis anterior recovery was comparable between groups. In contrast, Nerve Tape produced greater distal motor recovery in the extensor digitorum brevis, with approximately 1.8-fold higher compound muscle action potential amplitude and 74.3% versus 46.0% recovery compared with microsutures. Compound nerve action potential amplitudes recorded from the motor branch of the deep peroneal nerve were also greater with Nerve Tape, whereas conduction velocities were comparable. Histological analysis demonstrated preserved fascicular architecture distal to the repair in both groups, with no significant differences in axon count, mean myelinated axon diameter, or g-ratio in the terminal common peroneal nerve or its distal motor branch. Clinical use was demonstrated in a representative case with progressive recovery. Nerve Tape supported durable structural and functional recovery and improved distal motor reinnervation compared with microsuturing.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 05 Aug 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 11
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement