Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

IKKβ as a putative non-covalent and quinone-mediated covalent target of 4-methylcatechol in RANKL/NF-κB signaling: a combined computational and experimental analysis

Created on 05 Aug 2026

Authors

Xie, C., Zhang, L., Bao, X., Li, X., Ding, Y., Tabandeh, M., Basit, F., Velez, H., Kumar, S., Deepak, V.

Abstract

Excessive osteoclast activity contributes to pathological bone loss in osteoporosis, rheumatoid arthritis, and osteolytic malignancies. The effects of small catechol derivatives on receptor activator of nuclear factor-{kappa}B ligand (RANKL)-induced osteoclastogenesis remain poorly understood. This study investigated the effects of 4-methylcatechol (4-MC) on RANKL-induced NF-{kappa}B activation and osteoclast differentiation. 4-MC reduced RANKL-induced NF-{kappa}B luciferase activity in HEK-293T/RANK cells. 4-MC also suppressed RANKL-induced TRAP activity in RAW264.7 cells in a concentration-dependent manner and reduced the number of TRAP-positive multinucleated osteoclasts, without affecting cell viability. Molecular docking predicted non-covalent binding of 4-MC within the ATP-binding hinge region of IKK{beta} (PDB: 4KIK), forming a close polar contact with Glu97, predicted hydrogen bonds with Cys99, and a hydrophobic contact with Ile165, within the pocket occupied by the co-crystallized inhibitor K252a. Covalent docking predicted that the oxidized quinone form of 4-MC engages Cys179 in the IKK{beta} activation loop. Quantum chemical calculations confirmed a markedly higher electrophilicity index for the oxidized quinone than for the parent catechol, supporting this mechanism. In silico ADMET profiling indicated favorable drug-likeness and safety. These findings identify IKK{beta} as a plausible molecular target of 4-MC through both non-covalent and covalent mechanisms.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 05 Aug 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 11
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement