Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Cell-free pathway prototyping enables cost-effective biomanufacturing of 1,2,4-butanetriol at the 1-L scale

Created on 05 Aug 2026

Authors

Rasor, B., Rhea, K., Richardson, I., Lazar, J. T., Lee, M. F. S., Walters, E., Biondo, J., Kragl, F., Garcia, D., Zolkin, K., Davies, J., Lux, M., Karim, A., Jewett, M.

Abstract

Biomanufacturing offers sustainable alternatives to chemical synthesis under lower temperatures and pressures than traditional catalytic methods. However, the slow pace and iterative engineering bottlenecks of cell strain development restrict the feasible biological design space. Cell-free systems circumvent these constraints, providing a flexible and high-throughput screening approach to accelerate pathway prototyping and enzyme optimization but are not typically used for manufacturing scale-up. To understand the scalability of cell-free biosynthesis, we establish an end-to-end fully cell-free architecture to discover, develop, and scale the biosynthesis of 1,2,4-butanetriol (BT), a high-value industrial platform chemical. First, we systematically screened ~150 enzymes across the 4-step pathway from xylose to BT to identify highly active homologs for each reaction. Next, we applied statistical Design of Experiments to optimize reaction formulations for cost and titer. Finally, the maximum-titer and minimum-cost formulations were scaled up across five orders of magnitude, from 10-L to 1-L reactions. This resulted in peak volumetric productivities of ~1 g/L/h and yields over 13 g of BT in a single 1-L reaction, with raw substrate costs totaling just $3.00 per liter. This work expands the diversity of enzymes tested for BT synthesis and establishes a blueprint for advancing industrial biochemical manufacturing fully in vitro.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 05 Aug 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 40
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement