Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

PhysioMap: an ontology-grounded causal knowledge graph of human physiology

Created on 08 Aug 2026

Authors

Hoehndorf, R., SCHOFIELD, P., Gkoutos, G. V.

Abstract

Computational physiology needs representations that connect traits across biological scales while distinguishing causal, constitutive, and mathematical dependencies. We present PhysioMap, an ontology-grounded knowledge base of contextualized physiological traits and precisely defined relation types. A versioned projection maps entailed ontology patterns to a typed causal knowledge graph that constrains quantitative structural causal models. Derivative signs provide a separate qualitative abstraction, which the PhysioMap solver uses to analyze steady-state responses in the presence of feedback. A stratified expert re- view across all relation types supported most sampled relations and isolated a minority for correction or further investigation. In a rare metabolic disease application, nearly all determinate predictions agreed with the HPO-derived reference before post-hoc review; after the discordant reference directions were excluded, all remaining determinate predictions agreed. Shortest signed paths produced directional errors, particularly on cases for which the PhysioMap solver did not determine a direction, indicating that its abstentions concentrated difficult cases. Abduction usually narrowed the candidate set but often did not identify a unique cause. PhysioMap therefore connects ontology-grounded physiological content to interventional prediction and abduction under incomplete quantitative knowledge. Because PhysioMap curation and the HPO-derived reference may share supporting literature, and because abduction used a closed candidate pool, these analyses do not constitute independent clinical validation.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 08 Aug 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 10
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement