Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Therapeutic signature mapping of paired direct and indirect LPS injury in an ex vivo human lung perfusion platform reveals injury-specific druggable programs

Created on 08 Aug 2026

Authors

Abdalla, A. A., Pellicoro, A., Quinn, T. M., Dickson, S., Marshall, A., Bruce, A., Cole, J. J., Finlayson, K., O'Connor, R. A., Haslett, C., Shankar-Hari, M., Dhaliwal, K.

Abstract

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) remains highly morbid and lacks approved disease-modifying pharmacotherapies. Direct (pulmonary) and indirect (extrapulmonary) insults may initiate biologically distinct early injury programs, but human tissue-level evidence from the first hours is scarce. Here we establish a paired, acellular ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) platform using human donor lungs unsuitable for transplantation to model direct (endobronchial) and indirect (perfusate) lipopolysaccharide (LPS) injury within the same donor. We profiled lung tissue proteomes at 4 h post-insult and performed therapeutic nomination by querying proteomics-derived injury signatures against the CLUE L1000 perturbational compendium with independent cross-platform validation. Both models developed histological injury and robust cytokine release. Direct injury preferentially enriched neutrophil degranulation, extracellular matrix remodelling and metabolic reprogramming modules, whereas indirect injury showed prominent complement/coagulation perturbation with greater endothelial activation markers in perfusate. Cross-platform prioritisation converged on tractable signalling and epigenetic axes, including JAK/STAT, PI3K/AKT/mTOR, SYK, CDK and HDAC inhibitor classes - yielding a tiered shortlist for EVLP intervention testing. This intact human lung perturbation platform enables injury-stratified mechanistic inference and therapeutic prioritisation in early lung injury relevant to ARDS.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 08 Aug 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 1
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement