Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Topographic complexity shapes adaptive genomic variation in co-occurring plant species

Created on 10 Aug 2026

Authors

Lobos, S. E., Ahrens, C. W., Rymer, P. D., Hodgins, K. A., Miller, A. D.

Abstract

Co-occurring species often face similar selective environments, although adaptive responses to these environments are generally assumed to be species-specific, particularly in complex landscapes where selective pressures are likely to be multi-dimensional. We test this assumption by contrasting genotype-environment associations (GEAs) among a range of co-occurring but unrelated plants with different life histories from an isolated, mountainous national park in south-eastern Australia. Analyses were performed using single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) loci derived from reduced genome representation sequencing to investigate genomic associations with spatial and environmental drivers across unrelated plant species within the same heterogeneous landscape. Several species showed GEAs that aligned with similar environmental gradients, particularly edaphic features, suggesting that similar selective pressures can shape genomic responses across taxa. Other species exhibited distinct spatial and environmental associations, highlighting idiosyncratic outcomes. Notably, GEAs were detected at fine spatial scales despite generally low levels of genome-wide divergence, suggesting adaptive variants can persist in the face of gene flow under strong selective pressure. This study highlights how community-level genomic diversity is shaped by common environmental processes, with implications for biodiversity management in rapidly changing environments, where diverse ecosystem-level responses to selection may underpin resilience.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 10 Aug 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 11
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement